Donate search


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print

Dem Leaders Look to Screw Bernie Again (Warren Too)

As I sat and thought for way too long trying to figure out why in the world Nancy Pelosi conducted that ridiculous delay on submitting the articles of impeachment against Donald Trump to the Senate, I batted around a number of potential ideas:

  1. Pelosi didn’t want to do this in the first place because she thinks it is going to hurt Democrats in the upcoming election, so she was trying to find a way to stop it from going on without getting blasted by radicals in her own party. Casting Republican Senate leaders as the bad guys who wouldn’t play fair could potentially pull that off.
  2. Pelosi knew there was no way that the Senate would convict Trump and so she was trying to hold out until perhaps Democrats could take over the Senate in November. If Trump was not re-elected, it’s a non-issue; if he was, and she had a better chance in the Senate, she could submit them then.
  3. She was worried that Mitch McConnell would schedule the trial to take place in such a fashion that it drug key Democrat presidential candidates off the campaign trail, and thus hurt the party’s chances in November.

All of those ideas have some obvious holes, however. Why had Pelosi rushed through the impeachment hearings and proceedings only to then sit on the articles for weeks? If it was a matter of urgency, as she had said repeatedly, then why so lacking in urgency now? So many questions.

And therefore, maybe the most plausible theory of all is what Jon Gabriel just posited in a recent op-ed:

The Iowa caucuses will be held Feb. 3. The New Hampshire primary follows on Feb. 11. Likely during both, Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren will be stuck on Capitol Hill as former vice president Joe Biden and Mayor Pete Buttigieg barnstorm the early states… The Speaker wants to harm the more left-leaning presidential campaigns.

Why would Pelosi want this? She herself is a leftist, so why would she oppose the rise of Bernie and Liz Warren? Gabriel explains it’s because Pelosi isn’t focused on her policy preferences, but on her own power:

Look at it from her perspective. Getting a Democrat into the Oval Office is important, but Pelosi’s priority is to maintain, if not expand, her House majority. She masterfully engineered this in 2018, not by backing leftist candidates, but moderates.

Democrats knocked out Republican after Republican, many in red districts, with talk of pre-existing conditions, not socialist revolution. Most voters want modest improvements, not a tearing-down and rebuilding of society at large… Her delay tactics didn’t make sense as an impeachment strategy. But they make perfect sense if she wants to keep her Speaker’s gavel.

Granted, buying this theory requires me to ascribe to Nancy Pelosi a degree of cunning and intellect that I’m not completely comfortable granting her. I wrote recently that I think there’s something wrong with her mind, and that was only reinforced in her last press conference where she weaved together this bizarre string of buffoonery:

“As you know,” Pelosi said, “I referenced temporal markers that our founders and our poets and others have used over time to place us in time, to emphasize the importance of time, because everything is about time.”

Huh? You see why I’m hesitant to think such a woman capable of masterminding a shrewd political power grab.

But there’s one other thing that I’m left thinking about all this, supposing it’s true. Democrat leaders screwed over their far-left, Bernie-voting base in 2016. It seemed like through their application of superdelegates, Bernie would win a primary and Hillary would still grow her delegate count lead. There was no shortage of angst felt and expressed by the left at the time, even after Bernie bit the bullet and endorsed the ill-fated candidacy of the former First Lady.

But doesn’t it appear that they’re doing it again? What if Democrat leaders are preying on the far left’s unhinged hatred for Trump by agreeing to impeach him only so they can then coordinate the trial to harm the far-left candidacies?

At this point, it’s as probable a theory as any. And if it’s true, maybe it’s time for liberals to stop whining about how Republican efforts to remove dead and unregistered people from voting rolls is disenfranchising voters. It seems their own Democrat party may just be way ahead in that department.


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print


More Top Stories

Mike Bloomberg’s Arrogant Campaign

It was abundantly obvious on a debate stage in Nevada that Bloomberg is arrogant. A man with an ounce of humility would have engaged in serious debate prep instead of presuming he could just do it. Bu …

Breaking: It’s not Russia or Trumpers; Bernie Bros are just awful people.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that in the wake of claims by a mysterious “outside researcher,” it has investigated the origins of a bunch of pro-Bernie Sanders content on Facebook a …

No, It’s Not ‘Incredibly Dangerous’ for the Gun Industry to Market to Women and Minorities

Gun Down America’s Igor Volsky, an adamant proponent of gun confiscation, isn’t too thrilled to see the New York Times document the gun industry’s effective marketing efforts to wome …