Donate search
close

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print

New Zealand gun buyback has yielded poor results.

With the amnesty period closing rapidly, the program hasn’t been very successful.

For years, the Left has told us that gun control would never include confiscation of firearms. That façade, which those on the Right didn’t buy for a second, was finally shattered when Beto O’Rourke and Eric Swalwell based their entire brief presidential campaigns on removing firearms from law abiding citizens.

New Zealand is the latest example of a country pursuing an all-out firearm ban as a direct result of the Christchurch shooting. The New Zealand government instituted a buy back program, the amnesty period is ending within the next two months. And so far, the results have not been impressive.

According to Cam Edwards at Bearingarm.com noted:

With less than two months to go before the government-imposed deadline, fewer than 20% of the estimated number of banned firearms have been handed over.

Color me shocked that law-abiding citizens would be hesitant to turn over firearms. In fact, at the current rate:

The New Zealand government is on track to collect around 50,000 prohibited weapons pursuant to the buyback. That would impute a final compliance rate of around 29 percent, at the lower end, which would represent a modest but tangible success for policymakers.

If the Left in the United States thinks that a buy back program would work, all they have to do is look at the New Zealand and New York SAFE Act, both of which have been extremely unsuccessful. Persons want the ability to defend themselves and New Zealanders, without explicit protection of the right to bear arms, appear to have made the decision to brave the upcoming deadline without turning over their firearms.

Thank goodness for the 2nd Amendment.

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print

Advertisement

More Top Stories

Ma’am, This Is a Chicken Restaurant. Chick-fil-A Is Not The Boy Scouts, or Your Church.

I know: It looks bad. Chick-fil-A undoubtedly has suffered a PR breakdown, but one no worse than Nike, or even its competition in the chicken restaurant biz, Popeyes (who literally ran out of sandwich …

Does the Chamber of Commerce have an internal conflict on USMCA?

Impeachment may be dominating national news, but work aimed at making the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement (USMCA) law continues in Washington, DC.  As much as this was supposed to be the top age …

Give Chick-Fil-A the Benefit of the Doubt, But …

The fallout from Chick-Fil-A’s decision to stop supporting the Fellowship of Christian Athletes and the Salvation Army continues. The company needs to clarify its position. For the sake of argum …