Donate search
close
Listen Now The Erick Erickson Show streaming live arrow_right_alt close

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print

Facebook Defends Free Speech While Twitter Limits It.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg steers a different course than Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey on political ads and free speech.

There haven’t been many times in the last several years that conservative members of Congress have found common cause with social media tech giants. Every time a senior member of a social media group was in a Congressional hearing, it was cringeworthy.

Within the last week the head of Twitter, Jack Dorsey, made the executive decision to ban ALL political advertisements on the platform. While this move is well within the right of a private company to do, the decision smacks of a chilling of free speech. Politicians, PACs, or citizens wishing to connect with voters will no longer have the ability to buy and place ads on Twitter.

It wouldn’t be hard to picture other social media companies following the same path. Surprisingly, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has decided to defend free speech and will continue to allow political ads on its platform. At Georgetown University, Zuckerberg:

Defended the company’s decision to allow misinformation in political advertising on the platform, despite high-profile pushback against the policy.

“Given the sensitivity around political ads, I’ve considered whether we should stop allowing them altogether,” Zuckerberg said. “But political ads are an important part of voice – especially for local candidates, up-and-coming challengers and advocacy groups that may not get much media attention otherwise. Banning political ads favors incumbents and whoever the media covers.”

Ted Cruz agrees with this assessment and approach. And as a staunch conservative, free speech matters. He wrote:

If citizens are silenced, then the media and politicians are the only ones left. If you trust the New York Times to speak for you, great. If you think Fox News deserves to speak more than you do, well, this policy is great for you too.

But, if you think a lot of media are really, really biased, then censoring citizens and candidates and giving the media a monopoly is a terrible idea.

A ban on political ads only harms those who want change and emboldens those already in power. At least in this instance, Facebook and Zuckerberg made the right decision.

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print

Advertisement

More Top Stories

This Is a Big F-ing Deal: Biden, Twitter Blue-Checks Got Hacked

Wednesday, a who’s-who of blue checks were hacked on Twitter, leading the company to impose a brief, but unprecedented lock on all verified accounts tweeting or retweeting. As Joe Biden would sa …

Suburban Stampede

COVID-19 has changed life for most every American in some way. Some of these changes will be temporary, but it’s foolish to assume the virus will not permanently impact this nation in some significa …

Washington is Set to Appease White Liberals with the Redskins’ Name Change

The left will be happy, but the plight of Native Americans won’t actually change.