Donate search
close
Listen Now The Erick Erickson Show streaming live arrow_right_alt close

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print

Strong Words Over a New York Times’ Headline

Editor Dean Baquet reportedly referred to the change as a "f***ing mess."

By now I’m sure you’ve heard about the furor over the New York Times headline covering President Trump’s remarks after the horrific shootings in El Paso and Dayton. In case you missed it, the Times‘ initial headline was TRUMP URGES UNITY VS. RACISM.

The newspaper changed the headline to ASSAILING HATE BUT NOT GUNS, particularly after blowback from many on the left, including multiple Democratic presidential candidates.

New York Times editor Dean Baquet publicly admitted that the original headline was bad, but Mediate reports that he claims the change had nothing to do with pushback from Democrats:

“It was written on deadline and when it was passed along for approval we all saw it was a bad headline and changed it pretty quickly,” Bacuet told the Daily Beast.

“The fact that Beto O’Rourke and Cory Booker didn’t like it didn’t influence me,” Baquet assured Politico. “I don’t need the entire political field to tell me we wrote a bad headline. It was evident.” (emphasis in the original)

But the Daily Beast is reporting that Baquet had even stronger words for the headline in a staff meeting:

During a hastily arranged meeting, lasting well over an hour, top Times leadership addressed the paper’s staff about public criticism the outlet has faced in recent weeks centering around its coverage of Trump, race, and politics. 

The top editor reiterated that the headline was a mistake—“It was a f***ing mess,” he told the staff—but joined other newsroom leaders in cautioning staff not to overreact to Twitter comments about the paper’s editorial decisions.

Look, it’s all well and good that the New York Times claims that they won’t allow Twitter outrage to determine their headline – even when it comes from pretty prominent Democrats.

I’ll let you draw your own conclusions, but I can’t help but question the timing of their headline change, especially considering that they replaced a bad headline with one that’s almost as bad.

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print

Advertisement

More Top Stories

This is Curious and a Bit Bothersome

It was funny to see this story crop up in Politico this morning because it is something I wanted to talk about on radio even before seeing the story. Outside groups are concerned that the Trump team i …

Can the media redeem themselves? A former CBS News president has a suggestion

His suggested first step? Admit their biases. We all know that the media has been firmly tilted to the liberal side of the political. However misguided, they have continued to insist to the public tha …

To Own the Libs, Trumpists are Trying to Cancel a Twitter Engineer

What Trump’s Twitter troops are trying to do to Roth is despicable. They want to discredit Twitter, based in San Francisco, the most leftist city in America, because the company employs liberals who h …