Donate search
close

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print

NYT: Mexico Agreed To Border Concessions Previously

The major concessions in this week’s deal were negotiated months ago.

TheNew York Times reports that the border security deal between Mexico and the Trump Administration was not an eleventh hour deal as previously reported. Instead, the Times reports that Mexico had made the concessions in discussions over the past several months.

Per the Times report by Michael Shear and Maggie Haberman, officials from both countries have confirmed that the major concessions made by Mexico were made long before President Trump’s threat to implement tariffs. Specifically, the commitment to deploy troops to the Guatemala border was made in March and the agreement to detain asylum-seekers in Mexico was reached in December 2018.

Over the past week, negotiations to establish a “safe third country” treaty failed, the report notes. This agreement would have allowed the US to reject asylum-seekers who had not first sought refuge in Mexico.

A senior US official said that recent talks had yielded some small additional concessions from the Mexican government. The 6,000 troops in the new agreement represented a larger force than the original commitment. Mexico also agreed to an expedited timetable for the asylum program.

Separately, Bloomberg reported that there was no deal for Mexico to buy additional US agricultural products as Mr. Trump claimed in a tweet. The State Department summary of the border deal made no mention of agriculture and Mexico has no state-controlled agricultural entity that would food from American farmers. Individual  Mexican companies already import some farm products from the US.

“It was unclear whether Mr. Trump believed that the agreement truly represented new and broader concessions,” the Times writers note, “Or whether the president understood the limits of the deal but accepted it as a face-saving way to escape from the political and economic consequences of imposing tariffs on Mexico, which he began threatening less than two weeks ago.”

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print

Advertisement

More Top Stories

If you’re pro-life, best not apply to be a judge

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand believes that pro-lifers shouldn’t fill judicial benches. The Left is out to destroy any person who does not agree with the way they think. This has become even more evid …

Kyle Kashuv, Taylor Swift, Climate Change, and Why Secularism Always Ends With Gulags

Philiip Yancey, in his book What’s So Amazing About Grace, writes an anecdote about C.S. Lewis that has stuck with me. During a British conference on comparative religions, experts from around t …

Some Journalists Aren’t Happy About Facebook Wanting to Assess Their Trustworthiness

Facebook has its great share of problems, but could them assessing the trustworthiness of individual journalists be good? A lot of links and ads that circulate the popular social media platform have q …