Donate search
close

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print

Sweden to Resume Rape Investigation Against Julian Assange

Justice.

Sometimes those wheels move painfully slow, but OH, they move.

In August 2010, WikiLeaks boss, Julian Assange visited Sweden. The results of that visit were four charges of sexual assault and rape.

Rather than face his accusers, Assange fled. For years, the fight to have Assange extradited raged on. The Supreme Court of the UK fell on the side of the Swedish Government in 2012.

It was after that that he went to the embassy of Ecuador in London to seek asylum. He squatted there, disrespecting his hosts, not cleaning up after his cat, and even going so far as to smear feces on the embassy walls for nearly 7 years.

Nasty.

The statute of limitations on three of the four charges against him ran out in August 2015. As for the fourth allegation of rape, Swedish law allows a little more time, so any charges that might be brought on that specific case can be made up unto August 2020.

And it’s not like he has his convenient little hidey-hole at the embassy, anymore. On April 11 of this year, his asylum claim was suspended and he was evicted, with the British authorities taking him into custody.

He was sentenced to a year in a UK prison for violating his bail agreement to hide out in the embassy.

His big fear was that he’d be sent to the United States to face a host of charges here, not limited to his role in revealing troop movements in the Middle East and receiving and revealing other troublesome military secrets.

Yeah, there’s not threat of that happening, right now.

As it is, he was looking in the wrong direction.

Upon his eviction and his being taken into custody, the lawyer for his alleged victim moved to see that the case against him for rape of her client be reopened.

Asked. Received.

Earlier Monday in Stockholm, prosecutor Eva-Marie Persson announced that they would, in fact, be reopening the rape investigation against Assange.

“After reviewing the preliminary investigation carried out so far, I find that there still exist grounds for Julian Assange to be suspected on probable cause of the charge of rape,” Persson said.

Persson went on to say that a new European Arrest Warrant (EAW) will be filed for that time when Assange finishes his current sentence in the UK.

It’s still just an investigation, at this point, but what exactly is an EAW?

Valid across the European Union since 2004, the EAW was designed to speed up lengthy extradition operations and allows EU members to ask for the arrest and surrender of criminals in other member states.

However, Persson emphasized that a decision on filing charges had not yet been made.

“I would like to make the following very clear: my decision to re-open the preliminary investigation is not equivalent on whether or not to file an indictment with the courts. This is the matter we’ll have to revisit,” she added.

As with any criminal case, it depends on what the investigation turns up, but I’ll say this: for the victim in the case to still be clinging to this, insisting the case be reopened after all this time, she must feel certain there’s something there.

And of course, the excuse coming out of WikiLeaks is “political pressure,” not that the kind of man who squats in a government building to avoid criminal prosecution and smears feces on the walls is not the kind of man who might commit a sexual assault.

“Since Julian Assange was arrested on 11 April 2019, there has been considerable political pressure on Sweden to reopen their investigation, but there has always been political pressure surrounding this case,” WikiLeaks Editor-in-Chief Kristinn Hrafnsson said in a statement.

“This case has been mishandled throughout,” he said, adding that Assange “was always willing to answer any questions from the Swedish authorities and repeatedly offered to do so, over six years.”

“This investigation has been dropped before and its reopening will give Julian a chance to clear his name,” Hrafnsson said.

It was dropped because he ran. If he thought his name could have been cleared, why run in the first place?

Of course, the fact that there is a provisional request for extradition to the United States, based on his role in conspiring with former U.S. Army Intelligence analyst, Bradley Manning in 2010 to steal U.S. military secrets from Defense Department computers.

So will the U.S. get him first, or will Sweden?

Persson goes on to say she understands that the U.S. wants a shot at Assange, as well.

She added: “In the event of a conflict between a European Arrest Warrant and a request for extradition from the US, UK authorities will decide on the order of priority.”

According to UK law, in the case of competing extradition claims, the decision is left to the country’s Home Secretary to determine which petition takes precedence.

I don’t see our current administration pushing it.

Extradition lawyer Rebecca Niblock of Kingsley Napley told CNN that the Home Secretary would make that decision based on four things: “Firstly, the relative seriousness of the offenses; secondly, the place where the offense is committed; thirdly, the date the warrant was issued and when the request was received and fourthly, whether the person is accused or convicted.”

She continued: “It would be a very difficult decision for the Home Secretary to make because he would then have to decide on the seriousness of the offenses … rape against the computer intrusion. In my view the offense of rape would the more serious one — it carries a sentence of life imprisonment in this country.”

With 70 British lawmakers signing an open letter to U.K. Home Secretary Sajid Javid “to stand with the victims of sexual violence,” in regards to the case, I’m going to assume this case gets the first bite of the apple.

Assange’s arrogance may have been his downfall, and if it’s proven he’s guilty of this rape, then he’ll have a nice, long stay in prison to contemplate his poor choices.

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print

Advertisement

More Top Stories

If Kamala Wants to Beat Trump, She’s Got to Up Her Game

Several weeks ago when I wrote a piece ranking the Democrat presidential candidates from a conservative’s perspective I also included the prediction I’ve had for quite some time as to who the nomi …

Democrats Are Going to Actually Have to Compete Against Trump Now

House Democrats killed an impeachment attempt. Bob Mueller reported there was no coordination with the Russians. Mueller went on to decline to prosecute the President. That left one more silver bullet …

McConnell Says Everyone Should Choose Their Words More Carefully

The coverage of President Donald Trump’s latest tweet controversy is amazing. At the gym, I noticed how news network headlines demonstrated today’s echo chamber mentality: CNN crowed that …