Donate search
close

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print

Beth Moore’s “White Supremacy” Problem

There are few names within American mainstream evangelicalism as familiar as Beth Moore.  The founder of Living Proof Ministries, Moore’s career as a speaker and author has skyrocketed in recent months to the point that many speculate she will be the next president of the Southern Baptist Convention.

But with increased notoriety comes increased scrutiny, and a recent post by Moore invited plenty of it.  The popular Bible teacher took to Twitter to offer this bizarre observation:

There are simply no gospel grounds for defending White supremacy. None. This isn’t theological rocket science. The Savior of the world gave Himself on the cross for our sins to deliver us from the present evil age, according to the will of our God & Father, wearing a brown body.

Admittedly my tolerance for virtue-signaling (that is, making sure everyone knows how righteous you are comparatively speaking) is very thin, but this was the textbook definition of it.  After all, could anyone provide an actual list – naming names – of any orthodox evangelical Christian leader who is defending White supremacy?  Moore was actually asked to do that very thing by hundreds of frustrated followers.  For instance, a Twitter user known as “An Agent of the Protestants” responded to her statement by saying:

Cool.  Anyone: Do me a favor and link me to any living pastor in the OPC, PCA, SBC, LCMS, ARBCA, or other orthodox, conservative, Christian denomination who states otherwise. Or if we’re just saying things no one disagrees with to virtue signal, “Burning witches is bad!”

Feeling a bit of heat, Moore sadly retreated into this defensive posture:

In case anyone else is asking who’s actually defending white supremacy. There are lots of ways to defend it. Some are just more passive. Some deny it’s even an issue. (What are you smoking??) We can’t be unclear any longer on this sickness. If you don’t see it, you’re not looking.

Being charitable to Ms. Moore, I don’t think she intended it this way, but her defensive response could easily be seen as suggesting that if you don’t have any idea what she’s talking about you’re actually part of the looming problem of white supremacy.  Such intimations, without case or evidence, is hardly Kingdom-building. 

It is also logic-defying to say, “If you aren’t condemning a problem I say exists, you are necessarily defending that problem on gospel grounds.”  To provide an example, I find no evidence that Moore has spoken out consistently against the rise of gay clergy.  Would I then be justified in proclaiming that Beth is “defending gay clergy on gospel grounds,” or would that be an unfair leap of logic?

Here’s my point: if there are those orthodox Christian churches and ministers who are defending white supremacy, Christians certainly have an obligation to call them out, rebuke and correct them.  And Moore is right that we should do it publicly.  But if that isn’t happening, Moore is unnecessarily and unproductively tying a vile sin to the body of Christ in America for what purpose?  So she can appear honorable and morally superior? 

Again, I don’t know what motivated Moore’s statement, so I’m not lobbing an accusation.  But I am concerned that without clarification, she provides impetus for those opposed to the gospel to heap unjustified criticism upon the body of Christ for a sin it is not committing.

Interestingly if Beth is looking for a gospel-purifying cause to give her voice to, there are plenty of dangerous ideologies and manmade pagan philosophies infiltrating Christian campuses and pouring from Christian pulpits these days.  Egalitarianism, the so-called “gay” gospel, critical race theory, liberation theology, and racialism to name a few.  In actuality, Moore’s original tweet indicates a concerning element of racialism itself, highlighted by Darrell B. Harrison:

There also are no “gospel grounds” for placing an emphasis on the color of Jesus’ skin, as if that were of any significance in terms of enhancing the efficacy of the atonement that Christ accomplished vicariously on the cross for His elect, who are comprised of all ethnicities. 

Amen. I would humbly suggest that given her immense platform, Beth Moore owes it to the bride of Christ to either clarify her remarks or apologize to her.

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print

Advertisement

More Top Stories

Democrats Lack Numbers To Force Pelosi To Impeach

Pelosi is unlikely to enter into a battle over impeachment that she cannot win.

Does Anyone in Washington Care?

Democrats in Congress want to raise taxes so they have more money to spend.

Republicans used to claim they wanted to cut taxes to starve the beast, but now think that cutting taxes will stimulate the …

Here’s What Voters In Georgia And Alabama Think Of Their New Abortion Laws

Few have thought to check the opinion of local voters.