Donate search
Listen Now The Erick Erickson Show streaming live arrow_right_alt close


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print

There WAS an Undercover FBI Investigation Into the Trump Campaign

Did the FBI or President Obama’s Justice Department spy on the campaign of Donald Trump in 2016?

The answer to that depends on who you’re talking to, and what your definition of the word “spy” may be.

So, right off the bat, we can dispel the notion that there was covert surveillance of the Trump campaign, as President Trump suggested in 2018.

I get it. At a certain level of party devotion, it is expected that whatever raging claim of insidious connivance is tweeted out from day to day from his gold plated throne room, the truly devoted, less thoughtful members of the Branch Trumpidian compound are required to believe.

A subsequent investigation by the intelligence community determined there was no merit to the claims.

That’s not going to be much comfort for those who wait for Trump to tell them what their reality is, and they’ve followed his lead in throwing the FBI and our intelligence community under the bus.

In other words, you only believe Trump. No other truth need apply.

Define: Authoritarianism.

This is where I have to point out that now that Trump has installed a loyalist as Attorney General, the claims of “spying” have begun afresh.

AG William Barr, who proved himself to be a dutiful MAGA warrior before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, has revived the term, suggesting several weeks ago that he believed that Trump’s 2016 campaign was spied upon.

After dropping that nugget into the public consciousness, he attempted to clarify by saying the word “spying” means more than just the .007, undercover sneakfest that the term implies.

Too late. The genie is out of the bottle.

Today, The New York Times has released a developing story that is going to cut right to the heart of President Trump and his cabal’s claims.

In 2016, the FBI sent a woman posing as a research assistant to pick the brain of Trump campaign aide (and low-level coffee boy), George Papadopoulos.

The woman, who went by the name Azra Turk, reportedly met with Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign adviser, at a London bar, where she asked him about whether the campaign was working with Moscow.

The previously unreported episode comes amid growing scrutiny over the FBI’s actions toward President Trump‘s 2016 campaign. Trump has repeatedly accused the FBI of spying on his campaign, an allegation Attorney General William Barr has said he plans to look into.

So, spying, right?

I absolutely know that’s how this will be treated in certain circles, but for those willing to hold off on taking up their torches and pitchforks, it pays to use a bit of prudence.

Yes, Barr will look into this. He was hired to protect Donald Trump, not our nation or to uphold the integrity of the Justice Department.

Further, the DOJ’s inspector general has been looking into the FBI’s actions, as it pertains to the Russia probe. That report is expected by this summer.

Now, for those willing to listen, take this into consideration: Nothing in the report is saying this began the Russia probe.

George Papadopoulos came under scrutiny after drunkenly bragging in a bar to an Australian diplomat about Russia’s involvement with the campaign.

The diplomat, recognizing the severity of what Papadopoulos was saying, reached out to contacts in the U.S. government.

Before the FBI sent anyone undercover, there were already triggers that raised red flags about Donald Trump’s campaign.

Probable cause?

What we know for sure, after the release of Robert Mueller’s report, is that the Russian government preferred Trump over Hillary Clinton. We also see that members of Trump’s team welcomed their assistance.

Not a single member of Trump’s team went to the authorities to report when foreign entities reached out to them.

Papadopoulos claimed in a Thursday tweet that Turk was CIA, working with Turkish intelligence.

It’s like an episode of “Archer.”

Turk worked with FBI informant Stefan Halper, a Cambridge professor, on the operation, according to the Times, which reported that she posed as his research assistant.

Turk reportedly exchanged emails with Papadopoulos in which she said meeting him was “the highlight of my trip.” He met with Turk and Halper weeks after the FBI opened its Russia investigation, reportedly after Papadopoulos told an Australian diplomat a Russian source had offered to help the Trump campaign by publishing hacked Democratic emails.


Halper was reportedly directed to determine in his meeting with Papadopoulos what contact, if any, Trump campaign officials had had with Russia, according to the Times.

The coffee boy apparently took offense to being asked about the hacked DNC emails and if Russia was helping with the campaign. He stormed off without giving over any information.

British intelligence was also informed of the operation. That knowledge is likely what led the president to accuse our allies of “spying” on him, as well.

So the question stands: Is it “spying,” in the sense that most tend to take the word, if intelligence and law enforcement officials take their cues from questionable reports or activity and launch an investigation?

It’s not.


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print


More Top Stories

As Riots Rage, We Simply Can’t Rely On the Media to Tell Us the Truth

I don’t care for the descriptive phrase that has been utilized often in the press this last weekend which suggested that “America burned.” America didn’t burn. For one, America is more an idea …

Amazon Rakes Even Bigger Bucks in the Age of COVID-19

Let’s face it: Amazon has been a commercial behemoth for a long time now. It’s so easy to buy something online and wait for it to arrive in a couple of days, but the corporate giant became …

LIVE: The Erick Erickson Show – Riots and Trump Tweets

The Erick Erickson Show is live! Here’s the plan for today: Hour 1 Georgia audit by county The riots Atlanta Rest of the nation Divisions White Privilege and Reality The President’s problem Tw …