Donate search
close
Listen Now The Erick Erickson Show streaming live arrow_right_alt close

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print

Shame on Jeff Sessions

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has long prided himself on asking if things are constitutional before proceeding, but the constitutionality of his desires has run crashing into his law and order views.

By Erick Erickson

He has decided to expand a positively unconstitutional policy that should be ruthlessly fought in courts and legislatures around the country. Jeff Sessions wants to seize the property of Americans accused of crimes even if they are never found guilty by a jury.

Civil asset forfeiture has long been the government’s preferred means to confiscate property from suspected drug dealers and others. The problem, however, is that often the person is found not innocent by a jury and the assets are unrecoverable. According to the Department of Justice’s Inspector General, the Drug Enforcement Agency alone has seized more than $3 billion from people not charged with a crime.

In one case in 2016*, Oklahoma police seized $53,000 owned by a Christian band, an orphanage and a church after stopping a man on a highway for a broken taillight. A few years earlier, a Michigan drug task force raided the home of a self-described “soccer mom,” suspecting she was not in compliance with the state’s medical marijuana law. They proceeded to take “every belonging” from the family, including tools, a bicycle and her daughter’s birthday money.*

What is appalling here is that many states are enacting prohibitions on civil asset forfeiture, but the Attorney General wants to allow state and local law enforcement to use federal asset forfeiture laws to continue seizing property. Local law enforcement will thereby be able to get around their own states’ laws, so long as they share the spoils of their ill gotten gains with the federal government. This turns the concept of federalism on its head.

It amounts to state sponsored piracy against the American people, is unconstitutional, and the President should restrain his Attorney General. Frankly, given the hostility of the state of New York towards the President, he ought to curtail this now before Governor Cuomo and the Attorney General of New York use this on Trump, Inc.

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • send Email
  • print Print

Advertisement

More Top Stories

Newsom’s Stupid Gas-Powered Car Ban Draws EPA Rebuke

All of this green-ism is nothing but grandstanding and shallow politics, as is Newsom’s ban on gas-powered vehicles. If nothing changes, California will be back to horses and buggies by 2035, and then …

New Kaiser poll: If Trump wants to match Biden on health care, here’s what he should focus on

New polling from the Kaiser Family Foundation shows that Democratic presidential candidate former Vice President Joe Biden has a healthy lead over President Trump on the issue of health care, but that …

Ernst hammers Big Pharma in closing days of campaign

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) faces a tight re-election in a week’s time. But the senator – who finds herself in perhaps the tightest re-election race in the country – is not going down w …